Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Senior Counsel Ahmednasir Abdullahi/FILE

Kenya

Ahmednasir Rejects Supreme Court Return, Calls Lifting of Ban an “Appeasement Ploy”

He insisterd that the Supreme Court must publicly acknowledge that the ban was wrong, arguing that no group of seven judges should arrogate to itself the power to determine who may or may not practice before it.

NAIROBI, Kenya, Jan 23 – Senior Counsel Ahmednasir Abdullahi has declared that he will not resume practice before the Supreme Court, despite the court lifting the ban against him, his partners, and associates.

While welcoming the freedom granted to his firm, Ahmednasir says his personal boycott of the apex court will remain in place unless fundamental reforms are undertaken.

He insisted that the Supreme Court must publicly acknowledge that the ban was wrong, arguing that no group of seven judges should arrogate to itself the power to determine who may or may not practice before it.

“The Constitution of Kenya notwithstanding.” He warned that the court risks being perceived as the “personal property of seven individuals,” he stated.

Ahmednasir further stated that the serious integrity and competence concerns he previously raised against the court remain unresolved.

He argued that merely lifting the ban does nothing to address what he terms a deep‑seated legitimacy deficit, adding that these issues cannot be “swept under the carpet” if the prestige and credibility of the Supreme Court are to be restored.

Ahmednasir described his continued boycott as a deliberate sacrifice in his self‑declared war against what he calls “JurisPESA”—the alleged monetization and corruption of justice within the courts.

He opined that returning to practice before the Supreme Court would blunt his ability to speak freely against judicial misconduct.

“If I return, who will remain to fight JurisPESA in our courts?” he posed, noting that only a handful of lawyers are willing to openly confront the vice, citing former LSK President Nelson Havi as a rare exception.

Ahmednasir dismissed the lifting of the ban as an appeasement tactic, not a resolution of the underlying problems.

In a direct message to Chief Justice Martha Koome, he offered his assistance in reforming the judiciary, citing his experience as a former LSK Chair and Judicial Service Commission member.

“I am ready to help reform the courts and fight JurisPESA judges,” he said. “Madam CJ, mimi niko ready. Are you ready?”

Comments

More on Capital News

Headlines

Muturi referenced a past audit by KPMG, which flagged issues including duplicate entries and the presence of deceased voters in the register, saying the...

Top stories

The coalition called on the commission to safeguard its institutional independence, cautioning against any undue influence from political or administrative quarters, including the State...

Top stories

In a statement issued in Nairobi, the Iranian mission said Israel was attempting to divert attention from what it described as documented war crimes...

2027 KENYA ELECTIONS

NAIROBI, Kenya Mar 30 – The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission Chairman Erustus Ethekon has lauded the surge in youth voter registration in recent...

Top stories

The reforms are part of broader national efforts to improve Kenya’s standing in the global financial system, including the push to be removed from...

Top stories

In a Gazette notice published on March 27, the Commission announced that the exercise will run from March 30 to April 28, 2026, giving...

Kenya

Nyaribo explained that the county government provided Sh38,000 to facilitate the disposal process

2027 KENYA ELECTIONS

"Even if we sing Tuko Kadi, Wantam, or Tutam, if we are not going to the polls in large numbers, I assure you.. these...