Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DCP Party Leader Rigathi Gachagua

Kenya

BBS Mall owners want Gachagua censored by NCIC for linking them to Minnesota heist

Gachagua is under fire after lawyers accuse him of ethnic vilification over remarks connecting Eastleigh businesses to a US fraud case.

NAIROBI, Kenya Jan 6 – A legal complaint has been filed against former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua for remarks made during a Sunday church service in Kiratina, Kiambu County, that allegedly linked Kenyan businesses and the Somali community to a fraud scandal in Minnesota, USA.

The complaint, lodged by MMA Advocates on behalf of the owners of Business Bay Square (BBS Mall) in Eastleigh, calls on the National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) to investigate, censure, and, where necessary, prosecute Gachagua for statements that may undermine national unity.

According to the letter, Gachagua, speaking at AIPCA Kiratina Church on January 4, 2026, alleged that funds stolen in the United States were brought to Kenya and used to build commercial properties, including a mall in Eastleigh.

The lawyer representing the mall’s proprietors said the remarks explicitly linked the Somali community and identifiable businesses to criminal conduct without evidence.

“Any reasonable person listening to or reading these remarks would understand them as targeting Business Bay Square and, by extension, the Somali community,” the letter reads.

“Such statements stigmatize law-abiding citizens, damage lawful businesses, and undermine national cohesion.”

The letter cites the National Cohesion and Integration Act, which criminalizes the use of abusive, threatening, or insulting words intended to stir ethnic hatred.

It also references constitutional protections that safeguard equality, dignity, and freedom from hate speech.

Gachagua reportedly told the congregation that fraud must be investigated.

“Just send your people with a plane, come and pick that fellow from here… and the money returned… Because that fellow built that mall with that Minnesota money.”

MMA Advocates argue that Gachagua’s stature as a high-ranking public official gives his words weight and influence, increasing the potential harm to reputations and commercial confidence.

The complaint demands that the NCIC investigate the full context of the remarks, determine if they constitute ethnic contempt or hate speech, and, if warranted, issue formal censure and refer the matter for prosecution.

The letter also calls on media houses to exercise caution in broadcasting statements that could inflame ethnic tensions.

“The effect of these remarks is real, not hypothetical,” the lawyers wrote.

“They threaten the reputation and operations of lawful businesses, destabilize commercial relations, and can inflame ethnic animosity.”

The Commission has not yet responded to the complaint.

Copies of the complaint were also sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Comments

More on Capital News

Kenya

The President revealed that 3,000 MW of the target will come from nuclear power.

Kenya

The bench comprises Eric Ogolla, Roselyne Aburili, and Tabitha Ouya, who will preside over the matter due to its public interest and constitutional implications.

Kenya

The group, Kenya Unity for Memorial Peace Heritage and Culture Organisation, claims that heavy machinery was deployed last Tuesday at Githunguri Kiawairera, flattening land...

Kenya

The visual evidence captures a man described as having a brown complexion, dressed in caps and blue shirts, and wearing bracelets in the colours...

Kenya

Gachagua alleges attempts by PS Omollo to stop his interview with the Luo Nation, saying the community has the right to hear all perspectives.

Kenya

Gachagua urged authorities, including the Communications Authority of Kenya, to ensure that signals remain active so the Luo community can access the discussion freely.

Kenya

The site had already experienced tree clearance and heavy machinery operations and was cordoned off from the public and media.

Kenya

The court noted that the applications could not be considered ex parte, given the public interest and the impact on substantive rights.