Members of Uganda’s gay community and gay rights activists/AFP
“We are unsatisfied with the court ruling and we have appealed,” Deputy Attorney General Fred Ruhinda told AFP, adding that the appeal has been lodged at the Supreme Court, the country’s highest court.
“The law was not intended to victimise gay people, it was for the common good.”
Branded draconian and “abominable” by rights groups but popular domestically, the six-month old law which ruled that homosexuals would be jailed for life was scrapped on a technicality by the constitutional court on August 1.
The legislation, signed by Uganda’s veteran President Yoweri Museveni in February, also outlawed the promotion of homosexuality and obliged Ugandans to denounce gays to the authorities.
Judges ruled it had been passed in December without the necessary quorum of lawmakers in parliament.
US Secretary of State John Kerry had likened the law to anti-Semitic legislation in Nazi Germany, and Western nations made a raft of aid cuts to Uganda’s government.
On Saturday, activists gathered for their first gay-pride march since the law was overturned, waving rainbow coloured flags in celebration.
Critics said President Yoweri Museveni signed the law to win domestic support ahead of a presidential election scheduled for 2016, which will be his 30th year in power.
But it lost him friends abroad, with several international donors freezing or redirecting millions of dollars of government aid, saying the country had violated human rights and democratic principles.
Analysts suggest the surprise court hearing last week was encouraged by Museveni, so as to quash the law without appearing to cave in to foreign pressure.
But lawmakers this week also signed a petition calling for a new vote on the bill, and to bypass parliamentary rules that require it be formally reintroduced from scratch — a potentially lengthy process, with the last such bill taking four years from introduction to the final vote.
Over 165 MPs from both the ruling and opposition parties had signed the petition by Friday, more than the one-third of the 375 members needed to reach a quorum, should it be put before a vote in parliament again.
“Our prayer is that the Speaker waives house rules of procedure, to enable us to pass the bill without going through the three stages of the reading,” said lawmaker Latif Sebagala, a member of the opposition Democratic Party.
About The Author
