Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Justice Christine Meoli ruled that the legality or propriety of a prosecutorial decision cannot be interrogated through the testimony of a prosecuting counsel before a trial court/FILE/Judiciary

NATIONAL NEWS

High Court nullifies summons, arrest warrants against prosecutor in Kajiado case

The High Court in Kajiado has nullified summons and arrest warrants issued against a senior ODPP prosecutor, affirming prosecutorial independence in a land fraud case.

NAIROBI, Kenya, May 21 — The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) has secured a major legal victory after the High Court in Kajiado nullified summons and arrest warrants issued against a senior prosecutor over a prosecutorial decision to charge suspects in a land fraud case.

In the ruling, the High Court held that subordinate courts do not have jurisdiction to question the validity or propriety of prosecutorial decisions made by the ODPP.

The Court declared irregular the proceedings in which a senior prosecutor had been summoned to appear before the Kajiado Law Courts to explain the basis upon which charges had been approved in the matter.

“The Court also nullified the resultant warrants of arrest that had been issued against the prosecutor for allegedly failing to honour the summons,” the ODPP said on Thursday.

In a judgment delivered by Justice Christine Meoli, the Court ruled that the legality or propriety of a prosecutorial decision cannot be interrogated through the testimony of a prosecuting counsel before a trial court.

Judicial overreach

Instead, the Court stated, such decisions can only be challenged through appropriate legal mechanisms before a court with competent jurisdiction.

Justice Meoli found that the actions of the subordinate court amounted to judicial overreach and an attempt to indirectly supervise or control an independent constitutional office.

“The prosecution counsel, in making the decision to charge, was neither a State witness nor an investigator in the matter,” the Court observed.

The judge further noted that the prosecutor had not sworn any affidavit in the case and was not a person whose evidence was necessary for the fair determination of the proceedings.

According to the ruling, the prosecutor had been summoned solely for the purpose of being cross-examined on the decision by the Director of Public Prosecutions to approve charges in the land fraud case.

The ODPP welcomed the decision, describing it as an important affirmation of prosecutorial independence and the constitutional mandate of the office.

The High Court revision application on behalf of the ODPP was prosecuted by Vivian Kambaga.

Comments

More on Capital News

Headlines

According to the Kenya Red Cross, four people were rescued from the water and rushed to hospital for treatment, while efforts to trace four...

NATIONAL NEWS

Parliament has announced the 23rd National Prayer Breakfast will be held on May 28, 2026 at Safari Park Hotel in Nairobi as a High...

NATIONAL NEWS

President William Ruto has begun a five-day Coast tour featuring the launch of roads, markets, electricity, housing and education projects across six counties.

business

A tax expert has warned that Finance Bill 2026 proposals to tax digital payment platforms could undermine Kenya’s financial inclusion gains and increase the...

business

A KPMG East Africa tax expert has warned that Kenya’s proposed Finance Bill 2026 focuses more on raising revenue than stimulating economic growth or...

business

Kenya is seeking to fast-track a meat export agreement with China covering beef, pork, poultry and mutton under Beijing’s new zero-tariff framework for African...

FUEL PRICES

The governor urged residents not to politicize the recent fuel price hikes in a manner that harms innocent business owners and members of the...

Sustainability Watch

The UN General Assembly has adopted a landmark climate resolution backing the ICJ advisory opinion on States’ legal obligations, with Kenya among 141 countries...