UK seeks ‘urgent explanation’ as Hong Kong bans journalist

October 6, 2018 (3 weeks ago) 10:38 am
Shares
Victor Mallet, the FT’s Asia news editor and a British national, earned the ire of authorities for hosting a speech by the leader of a tiny pro-independence political party © POOL/AFP / Paul Yeung

, Hong Kong, China, Oct 6 – Hong Kong’s decision to effectively blacklist a senior Financial Times journalist required an “urgent explanation”, the UK said Saturday, as foreign governments sounded the alarm over eroding freedoms in the former British colony.

Victor Mallet, the FT’s Asia news editor and a British national, earned the ire of authorities for hosting a speech by Andy Chan, the leader of a tiny pro-independence political party.

Chan attacked China as an empire trying to “annex” and “destroy” Hong Kong in a strident speech at the city’s Foreign Correspondents’ Club (FCC), where Mallet serves as vice president.

China’s foreign ministry had asked the club to pull the talk, but the FCC refused, arguing that all sides of a debate should be heard.

Rival protesters picketed the lunchtime event and the city’s former leader Leung Chun-ying called for the club to be evicted from its government-owned premises.

In the aftermath of Andy Chan’s speech, former Hong Kong leader Leung Chun-ying called for the Foreign Correspondents’ Club to be evicted from its government-owned premises © AFP / Anthony WALLACE

The FT said Friday that immigration authorities in Hong Kong had declined to renew Mallet’s visa, a decision rights groups and media organisations said was unprecedented.

“We have asked the Hong Kong government for an urgent explanation,” the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office said in a statement.

“Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy and its press freedoms are central to its way of life, and must be fully respected.”

– ‘Disturbing’ –

Semi-autonomous Hong Kong enjoys rights unseen on the mainland, including freedom of expression, which are protected in the city’s Basic Law and the handover agreement between China and Britain.

But the space for dissent is shrinking as Beijing flexes its muscles.

Hong Kong authorities last week banned Chan’s Hong Kong National Party, calling it a threat to national security.

Protesters rally outside Hong Kong’s immigration department after the city declined a visa renewal for senior Financial Times journalist Victor Mallet, prompting warnings over the erosion of freedoms in the former British colony © AFP / Philip FONG

It was the first ban on a political party since the territory reverted to Chinese control in 1997.

The US consulate said Mallet’s visa denial was “especially disturbing”.

“It mirrors problems faced by international journalists in the Mainland and appears inconsistent with the principles enshrined in the Basic Law,” US consulate general spokesman Harvey Sernovitz told AFP.

Hong Kong’s last British governor Chris Patten said the move was a “serious blow against free speech” as well as defying the promise of a high degree of autonomy made to the city when it was handed back to China by Britain in 1997.

“The Hong Kong and Beijing authorities should think again and fast,” Patten told AFP.

A handful of demonstrators rallied outside Hong Kong’s immigration department on Saturday morning to protest the decision.

“No political red line. We support free press,” protesters chanted as they shredded a strip of red fabric to create a long ribbon.

A demonstrator holds a placard reading ‘freedom of speech must not be taken away’ © AFP / Philip FONG

The slogan was in response to comments by Hong Kong’s former leader Leung Chun-ying — whose administration faced down major youth-led democracy protests in 2014 — that discussion of Hong Kong independence “is an absolute and clear red line”.

The decision to deny Mallet a new visa was welcomed by pro-Beijing media in the city, however.

A commentary in the Ta Kung Pao newspaper said the veteran journalist had to “pay the price” for giving exposure to Hong Kong’s fringe independence movement, and said authorities may still act to evict the FCC from the premises it has occupied since 1982.

Shares

Latest Articles

News Podcasts

Most Viewed