Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The coronavirus halted this year's Super Rugby season in March, forcing New Zealand and Australia to set up their own domestic versions, while South African clubs and the Jaguares remain sidelined © AFP MICHAEL BRADLEY

Sports

Australia wants Pacific Super Rugby team based in Sydney

SYDNEY, Australia, Jul 18 – Rugby Australia said it would be “madness” for any Pacific Island team in a New Zealand-led revamp of Super Rugby to be based in Auckland and instead should play out of Sydney.

Plans for a Pacific side were unveiled Friday by New Zealand Rugby in a proposed shake-up of the flagship southern hemisphere club tournament from 2021 that would cull South African teams and Argentina’s Jaguares.

They would feature in a new-look competition containing New Zealand’s five existing teams, and two to four from Australia.

NZR chief Mark Robinson declined to say what he had in mind for the Pacific team, but previous proposals have suggested players from Fiji, Samoa and Tonga could be based in Auckland, despite potentially hurting the Blues’ fan base.

RA chairman Hamish McLennan said a Pacifika side would be better off in western Sydney, which boasts a large contingent of Fijians, Samoans and Tongans, and only from 2022.

“We have a large and wonderful Pacific Islander population in Sydney and I think that would strengthen rugby long term,” he told the Sydney Daily Telegraph.

“Basing them in Auckland would be detrimental to the (Auckland) Blues, it would be madness for the Blues.”

Reports in New Zealand have said ambitious new franchise Kanaloa Hawaii, backed by a slew of former All Blacks, was in discussions with NZR about filling the void of a Pacific Island team.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“I think the Pacifika idea is brilliant, but I would be housing them in Sydney,” added McLennan.

“And because of COVID, the fact we don’t know what’s happening, I am not sure we could guarantee them for next year.”

Australia has ruled out having only two of its Super Rugby teams in any new competition, and delaying a Pacific side until 2022 would potentially allow all five — Queensland Reds, ACT Brumbies, Melbourne Rebels, NSW Waratahs and Western Force — to play next year.

“Hopefully we are moving in the right direction, an eight-team competition with two Australian sides doesn’t work for us,” McLennan, who last week described the relationship with NZR as “a bit master-servant”, told the newspaper.

“So if 10 teams is on the table then we have the chance to create a world-class competition which will be highly valued and extremely exciting.”

If New Zealand insist on a maximum of four Australian teams, then Rugby Australia would face having to either axe a side, merge two teams or stick to its own domestic competition.

The coronavirus halted this year’s Super Rugby season in March, forcing New Zealand and Australia to set up their own domestic versions, while South African clubs and the Jaguares remain sidelined.

Robinson blamed the COVID-19 pandemic for the “extremely tough” decisions made around the new competition, saying it meant long-distance travel was impossible.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

More on Capital Sports

Football

NAIROBI, Kenya, May 25 – There is light at the end of the tunnel. After failed promises over the last three years since its...

Athletics

NAIROBI, Kenya, June 8 – Olympic Champion Caster Semenya and wife Violet Raseboya have hinted that they might be expecting a baby in a...

Athletics

NAIROBI, Kenya, Oct 15 – Daniel Wanjiru, the 2017 London Marathon champion has been slapped with a four-year ban by the World Athletics Disciplinary...

NFL

NAIROBI, Kenya, Aug 13 – Kenya’s history making Daniel Adongo, the first Kenyan to play in America’s National Football League (NFL), is now living...

© 2020 Capital Digital Media. Capital Group Limited. All Rights Reserved