When someone flees the scene of an alleged act, attempts to leave the country, claims diplomatic immunity and then calls the alleged act consensual, several inferences follow logically: there was an act; the perpetrator of the act was concerned that it was at least disreputable (flee scene and country) and at worst aware it was criminal (claim diplomatic immunity). And a court dismisses the case because of problems with the credibility of the alleged victim! The law is an ass!
Well said! It’s really pathetic but God is not asleep!