When someone flees the scene of an alleged act, attempts to leave the country, claims diplomatic immunity and then calls the alleged act consensual, several inferences follow logically: there was an act; the perpetrator of the act was concerned that it was at least disreputable (flee scene and country) and at worst aware it was criminal (claim diplomatic immunity). And a court dismisses the case because of problems with the credibility of the alleged victim! The law is an ass!
Well said! It’s really pathetic but God is not asleep!
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *