Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

top

Kenya

DCJ Mwilu bows out of appeal by businessman Asanyo

Justice Mwilu said she excluded herself from the case since Asanyo’s lawyer, Okong’o Omogeni, is among her defence team challenging her proposed prosecution over corruption allegations/FILE

NAIROBI, Kenya, May 14 – Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu has bowed out of an appeal lodged by businessman Geoffrey Asanyo contesting the dismissal of his Sh43 million compensation for a 2002 unlawful arrest and malicious prosecution.

Justice Mwilu said she excluded herself from the case since Asanyo’s lawyer, Okong’o Omogeni, is among her defence team challenging her proposed prosecution over corruption allegations.

A five-judge High Court bench is handling Mwilu’s constitutional petition and will deliver its judgment on May 31.

Senior State Counsel Cliff Menge, representing the Attorney General, had applied for an adjournment on grounds that he had filed an urgent application before the Court of Appeal that was pending adjudication.

Justice Mwilu, sitting with Supreme Court judges Ibrahim Mohamed, Smokin Wanjala, Njoki Ndung’u and Isaac Lenaola, postponed the hearing of the matter to await the appointment of a fresh bench.

Asanyo, along with his firms – Makana Motors, Multiple Sales Promoters and Wakam Enterprises – had sued the Attorney General on behalf of the defunct Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACA), for unlawful arrest and prosecution.

He had been charged in 2002 with allegedly giving Sh180,000 to the former Town Clerk of the defunct Nairobi City Council, Zipporah Wandera, as inducement for her to facilitate payments to Makana Motors Ltd.

Six years later, the Attorney General withdrew the charges under Section 87 (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC).

Asanyo and his firms filed the suit in 2009 seeking special and general damages.

Retired High Court Judge David Onyancha, in a judgment delivered on May 21, 2014, awarded Asanyo and his firms a whopping Sh472 million compensation after finding that the Nakuru-based businessman was the brains and engine of his trading empire.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

He had stated that Asanyo’s arrest, detention and prosecution was unjustified, malicious and adversely affected his liberty and reputation.

The Attorney General was dissatisfied with the judgment and filed an appeal but the parties engaged in negotiations seeking an amicable settlement of the matter.

Later, Asanyo accepted an offer by the Attorney General for an all-inclusive amount of Sh42.8million and the parties filed a written consent on September 18, 2015. in the Court of Appeal.

On November 20, last year, Supreme Court Judges Ibrahim, Jackton Ojwang, Wanjala, Ndung’u and Lenaola had directed the Court of Appeal to adopt the mutual agreement as a judgment of the court.

They nullified the judgment delivered by Appellate Judges William Ouko and Agnes Murgor after Justice Patrick Kiage disqualified himself.

About The Author

Comments
Advertisement

More on Capital News