(Visited 7 times, 1 visits today)



  1. Avatar Joe Karuri May 22nd, 2013 at 9:08 am

    That is just absurd to say the least. Actually, it makes sense the other way around.

    It is the online content creators that help mobile networks make money from selling data bundles to access that content.

    1. Avatar sura mbaya May 22nd, 2013 at 9:54 am

      Agreed. These telecoms charge the end-user for accessing the network. They are trying to burn the candle on both ends. It’s like a transporter charging both the sender and the recipient for the same parcel delivery.

  2. Avatar gedimuhando May 22nd, 2013 at 9:12 am

    Mr Ghossein is very right.Not only google but yahoo and wikipedia should pay a small token of their revenue to network providers that help carry traffic for the search engines.But this should be on condition that the network providers will only use such revenue in upgrading their infrastructure and not lining their pockets.

    1. Avatar sura mbaya May 22nd, 2013 at 9:55 am

      So, why not charge every single website that users access while on those networks, huh? This is ludicrous.

  3. Avatar akamax May 22nd, 2013 at 10:41 am

    TALK SENSE men……this network service providers charge us to access those free services……what if the likes of google,wikipedia,yahoo start charging for the freebies we get from them…….let this dieing goose in the name of orange be smart like safaricom have services that can attract customers to their network


Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *