Google book deal gets cautious welcome

November 17, 2009 – European book publishers gave a cautious welcome on Monday to new proposals by Internet giant Google to clear the way for millions of books to be sold on-line.

GOOGLE_BOOKS_342654453.jpg“It is positive that the parties considered the concerns of European publishers and made some steps, however we want to analyse more thoroughly the new Settlement before giving a final comment,” the Federation of European Publishers said in a statement.

The modified settlement, which runs to nearly 370 pages, seeks to address copyright and anti-trust objections raised by the US Department of Justice and others to the original version of the complicated legal agreement.

Google and the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers reached a settlement last year to a 2005 copyright infringement case.

Under the settlement, Google agreed to pay 125 million dollars to resolve outstanding claims and establish an independent “Book Rights Registry,” which would provide revenue from sales and advertising to authors and publishers who agree to digitize their books.

The Justice Department said the book-scanning project “has the potential to breathe life into millions of works that are now effectively off limits” but objected to the original settlement on copyright and anti-trust grounds.

One of its concerns was that the settlement, as originally drafted, would give Google sole authority over so-called “orphan works” — out-of-print books whose copyright holders cannot be found — and books by foreign rights holders.

The initial deal also caused concern in Europe where some publishers feared it could allow Google to publish European books, without authorisation, that were no longer available to US customers

The European publishers group said it also appreciated that non-English language works were also excluded from the deal.

(Visited 16 times, 1 visits today)



  1. Afriti Kizee September 18th, 2012 at 9:44 am

    UK has held a leading strategy to stop RAO to the presidency but has never said or made people believe that he would not work with him after general election regardless of the winner.

  2. nyakach September 18th, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    Uhuru’s coming to Nyanza, most specifically Kisumu is a sign that he wants to be the president of Kenya, not some part of Kenya. All of us Kenyans must strive to live peacefully with our neighbors, let the hate-games end. This should start by the little man down there to the top, and vice-versa. Kenya is greater than all of us, it will still be here once we gone!

  3. Kwessi Pratt September 18th, 2012 at 4:52 pm

    Kenya has never had any problem untill those who lie to achieve their futile objectives surfaced on the scene. If someone didnt come around priding himself as a strong candidate just because of big tribal numbers, tribalism would be dead by now. If some fellow didnt come up with this idea of 41 against one, we would never have witnessed violence on our land. If some guy didnt refuse to follow the laid down precedures, Kenya would forever have remained a peaceful nation. If some guy didnt incite people against his political opponents, Kenyans would not be embracing tribalism with zeal they have today. If someone didnt use falsehoods to fake election theft, Kenya would be a better country today. If someone didnt resort to mass violence Kenya would not be facing the near rebellion situation we are witnessing in some parts of the country. If someone hasnt perfected violence as a political tool as witnessed in some constituency in the just concluded by-elections, Kenyans would be peaceful people. If someone had not introduced defiance at national level, we would not be witnessing it down in the village. If someone had not eroded police authority at the national level, guys in the slums wont be attacking our officers on patrol. If someone had not gone around calling others landgrabbers, surely Kenyans would not be hating those who own property. We therefore should not pretend that we dont know where our problems are coming from. We should start by asking those who, for no apparent reason, have caused alot of pain on Kenyans to apologize. Beating about the bush wont help us pals. We need to get to the root cause of the problem. Other diversions are no more than empty futility!

    1. Amos Kasera September 24th, 2012 at 9:47 am

      if someone could only write his comments based on facts and not Railaphobia or hearsay, then Kenya would surely be a better place ….. My friend Mr Kwessi there is alot of HATE and aggression in your words. Your argument is that Uhuru should not campaign in Kisumu due to your Railaphobia. Its a good thing that Uhuru does not share such primitive and backward mentality, hence he went ahead and campaigned in Kisumu. your mentality is the last thing we as kenyans need this coming elections. The author of this article was simply trying to say that if anybody wants to vie for the position of presidency, they should also campaign in areas that are perceived as strongholds of their rivals. It appears you sleep, eat and drink Raila … get a life!! .. if not for your sake at least for our country’s sake!

      1. Kwessi Pratt September 24th, 2012 at 12:10 pm

        @Amos Kasera: Re-read my post! And if you still fail to understand, say as much. We will then come in. Otherwise, a huge contempt card!!!!


Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published.