Signed edition of Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' on sale in Britain

A_signed_copy_of_a_first_edition_of_Adolf_Hitler__s_book___Mein_Kampf___351498699.jpgAugust 12 – (LONDONAFP)

A signed, early edition of Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” is expected to sell for up to 20,000 pounds (23,000 euros, 33,000 dollars) when it goes under the hammer in Britain Thursday, auctioneers said.

The book, dated 1925, is inscribed with a dedication to Georg Maurer, whom Adolf Hitler met in Landsberg Prison in Germany while serving a sentence for treason after the failed 1923 Beer Hall Putsch uprising in Munich.

Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf” — which means “My Struggle” in English — while serving his sentence at Landsberg. He originally wanted to call it “Four And A Half Years Of Struggle Against Lies, Stupidity And Cowardice”.

Maurer was a local Nazi official incarcerated at the same time who later fell out with Hitler after giving a list of Nazi supporters to a Marxist newspaper.

Initially, “Mein Kampf”, which outlines Hitler’s extreme anti-Semitic ideology, had a small print run but during his time as German leader from 1933 to 1945, it was enormously popular.

The book was even given out free to newly married couples in Nazi Germany.

Richard Westwood-Brookes of auctioneers Mullocks, who are selling volume one of the work at Ludlow in western England, said it was “very, very, very rare”, adding he had had interest from as far afield as Russia and the United States.

“There’s this incredible interest in Hitler,” he told AFP. “The bad boys in history are always the ones that people get really interested in.”

Mullocks are selling the copy of “Mein Kampf” alongside a signed self-portrait of Hitler found by a British soldier in the house of a wealthy Nazi in Cologne in 1945 as he and other troops patrolled the city.

The self-portrait, which is in pencil and dated 1926, is also expected to sell for up to 20,000 pounds.

(Visited 77 times, 1 visits today)



  1. frank September 13th, 2012 at 10:01 am

    i think in all fairness you seem to be siding with one side here.Freedom of speech is guaranteed in the constitution and those aggrieved by accusations can always seek redress in court.As for the police i believe they are sharp enough to know Kenyans aren’t fools and can tell the truth from lies.Lets be neutral while addressing national political agenda.

  2. Sam September 13th, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    @frank Ofcourse, he’s always biased.

  3. Peter Konza September 13th, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    Good observation and a enticing narration, but i think you should also be careful not to incite Kenyans against the police. It is known that there is the NCIC which is mandated with the responsibility to deal with incitement and hate speech mongers. Remember it started the same way before the 2007 general elections and later the pev rumours of rigging, manipulation of the police, unreliable courts, and no ….no……..peace. when one principals in the coalition government said there are people supposed to be in Kamiti instead of going around the country in the name of prayer rallies, what did you make out of that, or u cant hear that. Yes i agree with you Kenyans are watching

  4. Kwessi Pratt September 13th, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    Mr. Wambugu may be like your pay master you think Kenyans are stupid. They are not! Where your loyalty lays is where the Kenyan problem emanates from. There is no doubt about it at all. Why? Thats because your favorite presidential candidate is actually armed with alot of nothing, apart from abscenities and one hell of blaming. Infact, am beginning to suspect that the bug has caught up with you!

    Our police officers have been through hell since your preferred candidate incited public against them during the launch of the new the constitution. Am sure you noticed that he was the only leader to tell the police to lay off their hands from the public. Within no time, officers in his slum constituency were attacked by the same public. A few days later, a traffic officer was pinned down and assaulted by a driver inspired by your wonderful leader! Your wonderful leader never even attempted to qualify his pronouncements. That he had eroded police authority in the eyes of the public is not in doubt. I dont even need to add that, Gen. Ali was his punchimg bag! His being carted away to the Hague had nothing to do with PEV but because of twisted hate propaganda spewed against him by your favorite boy.

    Our police officers have definitely learned from these instances. They know guys use propaganda to tie hands of police officers and then scream inaction! Its totally unacceptable and unbecoming of any leader. They have to given clear instructions that are not ambigious. Either they be told to shoot to kill any inciters defying orders, or guys like you Wambugu should go down to Tana Delta to hold brief for them. There are no two ways about it!

    When the terror suspect Aboud Rogo was killed, violence errupted in Mombasa. Policemen were killed. However, the fellows calling themselves civil society hardly said a word about the murdered officers. Perhaps, the officers didnt have rights as far as these fellows are concerned. The civil society only go for easy targets and thats the police officers. Of course, it makes an easy good case when you thoughtlessly accuse armed institution of “extra-judicial” killings!

    However, proper investigations reveal not only empty accusations, but also unbelievable ignorance. As with case of Rogo fellow, he was killed near a police station. Police took about 5 minutes to get to the scene. But were probaly able to see the place right from their gate. Nonetheless, when they arrived there, perhaps to give false trail, Rogo’s friends, who apparently were already at the crime scene, (in less than 5 minutes and they dont even live anywhere near there!) accused the police of murder! They even refused to allow police do their work.

    Then they took the dead body straight to the cementry, perhaps to make sure that the guy had no chance of of survival. They buried him without confirmation of his death by a doctor! To inextricably cloud everything, riots were instigated. But still all these chain of events didnt prevent our “human rights” organizations from accusing the police! If these organization were truly interested in human rights, they would have by now called for the arrest of Rogo’s wife and those who prevented the police from doing their work. They would also be fighting for the dead officers and asking for proper probe on why goons were allowed to bury somebody who might not have been dead.

    The culture of only blaming while never ever offering solutions to problems is what ails us. Your preferred guys have been on that streak for far too long. They are ever ready to inflame fires or start them. But they have no ideas on how to put out such fires. This has continued for close to 20 years now. Am sure you saw them in Kajiado North accusing others of grabbing Maasai land. Of course, the laws and pocedures of the country cant perrmit anyone to grab any land at all. Kenyans need to ask themselves if in the village, where in some areas there are no titles, no one can grab land, how would it be possible to grab land in a city? Someone is lying! And tell us what would stop communities rising against one another if a senior leader tells them that their land has been taken away by others? What purpose are such pronouncements meant to serve?

    1. Mwaisaka Wangai September 17th, 2012 at 1:10 pm

      I beg to differ with respect to Aboud Rogo’s death. Islamic burial rites, unlike other religion or traditions dictate that burial should be done as soon as possible. Also, much as we may not like it, fact is Aboud Rogo as a Muslim cleric, did have many followers/sympathizers in Mombasa so it is not unusual for his followers (or friends as you say) to be near the scene of the killing. In addition to the fact that he had been perpetually hounded by the authorities, one cannot therefore blame his family, who did witness the killing, to point accusing fingers at these same authorities. It just happens to be that the police is the face of the authorities to the common mwana inchi.

      Of course you and I know it is highly implausible that such a high profile crime can occur opposite a police station and the perpetrators disappear without a trace. So we are left with two plausible conclusions; either we have the most incompetent security apparatus or there was complicity.

      1. Kwessi Pratt September 17th, 2012 at 4:01 pm

        @Mwaisaka Wangai: Perhaps you dont know what you are saying. Before you comment you must understand the circumstances and location of death. Being a cleric doesnt mean you move around with hordes of fellows. First, the guy was killed in place where there are no residential areas. Just opposite Whitesands Hotel. Its not possible therefore to have been with his friends. It was clearly stated that they came after incednt. And not only that, the Rogo was traveling with his family to avoid being hit, as we were told by those in the car. Assuming indeed he was with his friends as you claim, they would surely be knowing registration numbers of the verhicle that carried the hitmen.

        You are therefore creating a scenario which was not there to justify your accusation against the police. Why is it that no single person in Rogo’s vehicle was able to take registration numbers of the killer car? And they all stated that they knew they were being followed by strange cars? Was it a deliberate action not to take vehicle numbers that was being ridden by the killers? Was their hostility towards the police really genuine or mere cover for their crimes?

        You are also being very naive if you believe police can shoot someone at their gates. The possible scenario is that Rogo’s friends killed him at the gates to incriminate the the police. That there were no attempts to take him to hospital point to a very sinister motive indeed. Infact, the investigating officer should arrest Rogo’s wife and all the other lot that was in the vehicle. Why they started pointing fingers instead of taking the fellow to hospital? You cant take unconfirmed dead person for burial and moreso, when crime is involved. He has to be pronounced dead by a doctor. But you know when you suspect that he might have seen you and could be revived at the hospital, you create hostile situation, hasty burial. This is in order to avoid any chances of him waking up and saying who shot him.

        1. Mwaisaka Wangai October 15th, 2012 at 7:37 pm

          Sorry for the late reply, but for what its worth let me just recant a few points. I did not say the late cleric moved around with ‘hordes of fellows’ its just that he was popular in Mombasa. In this day and age its not unusual for information to spread like wildfire in minutes. Also, I am not trying to create any scenario and am afraid you may be the one who doesn’t know what you’re saying since as a resident of Mombasa I have a good idea of what I am talking about. And naive I am not, not even to the extent of believing that our authorities are as clean as a whistle as you maybe inferring. Please note also, I did NOT say the police shot the cleric – Why did you jump to that conclusion?

          With the benefit of hindsight, it is very easy to say that, after the vehicle you’re travelling in has been shot at by ‘hitmen’ and one of your kin dead/dying in a pool of blood, first thing you would do is to get a pen & piece of paper and calmly jot down the registration no. of a … SPEEDING ‘killer car’? Does that sound plausible to you?

          Am afraid the late cleric joins a long list IMHO of assassinations in this country where ppl may never know the truth.

  5. Ralp September 13th, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    Wambugu is just saying what Raila told him to write. Pity…….

  6. kedgimibadhi September 19th, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    Let us respect the rule of law and justice. It is the starting point for realising a fair and democratic system that treats both the poorest and the richest equally. It is the common ground. Also let us not blame the people who constitutionally do not have control at all over the police force. It is a misdirected anger. I do not know how one feels when he/she is scrambling to be a leader while at the same time not respecting the rule of law. To me that implies chasing personal interest at the expense of the people.


Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published.