Ruto’s criticism of KKV is misplaced


At the end of the post-election violence and the beginning of the Grand Coalition Government in 2008, Kenyans found themselves in dire straights. The country was gripped by drought that caused serious food shortages and death of animals and people.

Exceptionally high oil prices, and the melt down of the world economy caused even more damage to the economy.

At the end of 2008, Kenya’s growth forecasts were scaled to between 2 and 2.5 percent, down from 7.1 percent in 2007.

Unemployment had been a problem even before the violence. In fact, one of the issues identified by the Waki Commission was poverty, inequality, and unemployment, particularly among the youth. The Waki report, like similar ones, observed that over one half of Kenyans live under absolute poverty, the gap between the rich and the poor was widening and income inequality in Kenya was one of the highest in the region.

Government data indicated that almost one in three of Kenya’s poor population was between 15-29 years of age. Half of these were youth between 15-19 years of age and who had a poverty rate of 51 per cent, which was larger than the national average. Every study indicated that the social and economic conditions would be even more difficult beyond 2009 and poverty levels were expected to increase again.

The violence highlighted the importance of addressing poverty and inequality, and in particular, the increasing problem of idle youth.
The World Bank’s Country Social Analysis in 2007 had found that youth’s unemployment, especially among males, is a major contributor to frustration and tension particularly in urban areas.

Confronted with these grim statistics, Prime Minister Raila Odinga, his position in Government only grudgingly accepted by his coalition partners, put his mind to searching for practical measures that would provide a social safety net for young Kenyans at risk of hunger and starvation.

That search gave birth to the Kazi Kwa Vijana programme, a “Marshal Plan” that emphasized the importance of a coordinated and multi-sectoral approach to addressing the problem of youth unemployment and youth idleness.

In April 2009 Kazi Kwa Vijana was launched, aiming to employ youth in rural and urban areas in labor intensive public works projects. The programme was expected to put money in the hands of youth, have it circulate in rural Kenya while at the same time helping the government maintain roads, restocking depleted forests and addressing water and sanitation problems, among others.

Within a year, KKV was judged a runaway success. The International Labour Organisation said “KKV made commendable progress in youth employment creation by achieving 112 per cent of the planned target.” By mid-September 2009, a total of 296,080 youths had been directly employed under the programme, according to ILO.

ILO said KKV “appears to be a viable method of completing stalled projects or rehabilitating existing ones which require only small inputs of construction materials and labour.” It further described KKV as “a perfect vehicle for attainment of MDGs and Vision 2030.” KKV was actually stopped in the 2009/2010 Financial Year when Treasury failed to allocate it money and instead funded the Economic Stimulus Package.
In recent months, as his tantrums against the Prime Minister have grown louder and more repetitive, Eldoret North MP William Ruto has attacked KKV at every turn. This, despite the fact that the programme stopped two years ago.

Ruto has declared KKV an outdated exercise by the government to offer jobs to the youth in the 21st century. In the latest attack on Thursday, Ruto wondered how, in the age of the internet, knowledge economy, E-commerce, Face book and twitter, the Prime Minister could think of having young Kenyans engage in manual labour.

In all his opposition to the programme, Ruto has never offered his alternative to Kazi Kwa Vijana. On Thursday, he never explained how twitting or face booking can put money in youths’ pockets.

Ruto’s position is that they youth comprise 75 percent of voters in the country and should be prepared to elect leaders who will address unemployment. Implied in this statement is that the youth should wait in poverty, and, probably for handouts and vote for him in 2012.

Ruto contends that majority of youths have pursued education up to university level and cannot do manual work. But he offers no evidence that majority of Kenya youth have university level education.

Not that the Prime Minister did not recognise that there are educated youth in Kenya who equally need jobs. The difference with Ruto is that Mr Odinga did not just talk about that recognition. He used his high credibility to convince the World Bank to finance the Kenya Youth Empowerment Project or KKV Phase II. This project seeks to increase access by the educated youth to targeted temporary employment. It also seeks to improve youth employability by providing work experience and skills through internships and relevant training in the formal and informal sector. This component is a practical pilot step to address the widely acknowledged fact that although the Kenyan youth are graduating from college, they lack the required skills and work experience being sought by most employers.

The fact is, the Prime Minister saw a problem and did something to address it while William Ruto is talking about the problem. A nation is in peril when leaders have too many high sounding words, and too few actions that correspond with them.

The last time Kenyans heard the Eldoret North MP push some agenda to do with the youth was in 1992, when he, together with Cyrus Jirongo, headed a destructive organisation called YK92. To date, there is nothing standing, not even a desktop computer on which the youth can access face book and twitter that can be traced back to YK92. The only lasting legacy of that evil invention is the culture of handouts that it instilled in the youth and the savaged economy it left behind.

(Dennis Onyango is the Communication Secretary, Office of the Prime Minister)

8 Replies to “Ruto’s criticism of KKV is misplaced”

  1. Dennis Onyango, I quite agree with you on this!. Even in very advanced economies it has never been known that facebook and twitting has put money in the pockets of youths other than social networking. Not every person in any given setup has the opportunity to get a university level education. And even for those who have it, how many are technology savvy?. As a youth, with multiple degrees up to and including advanced level, I just fear for my brothers and sisters who have never been lucky and had an opportunity like myself. Some of us even with little political popularity are struggling to find projects that can keep our youths engaged in a more productive manner!. It is just surprising that a person seeking leadership of a country still believes in whipping youths and his tribe to vote for him by giving them handouts without any long term solution to their problems. Instead of criticizing all the times to win sympathy, it is a prudent idea if Mr. Ruto at least for once engaged the public in discussing tangible ideas that can move this country forward. So far I have heard none from him and I wonder if his bid for presidency is all about revenge and trivializing issues and dividing communities because of his going to the Hague to answer to crimes against humanity? All there is known about Mr. Ruto is the YK’92 project that helped impoverish the country and numerous cases about public grabbing and his chest-thumping. Does Ruto and company really represent the interests of the Kenyan youth other than their own hidden agenda and selfish interests? It is high time a Kenyan youth got real representation!!.

  2. Well said Mr. Denis, I wish u could organise tv and radio shows to make sure that these facts are understood by many youths and everybody out there listening to empty talks from the gang of seven idiots!

  3. Good article Mr Onyango. 
    If Hon. Ruto wants the PM to be judged by his performance/non-performance in the KKV project, then it is only fair that Ruto be judged by his performance as the former minister for agriculture too! If during his time he introduced any policy that would is going to improve our food security, then he should be given all the time to make noise. Otherwise he should just shut up and let leaders who’ve got ideas rule…
    Leaders who thrive on opposing other people’s ideas while never coming up with their own shouldn’t be entertained if we’re to move forward. From my personal observation, Ruto would be lost without the PM. He only exists to poke fingers at the policies being supported by the PM.
    So, Hon. Ruto, if you do read this, please, please, please, do come up with one good policy/idea… And don’t be surprised if you get the backing of the PM!

  4. Way to go Dennis!! I have always wondered why the PM’s office doesn’t just take out a newspaper ad or pay for a TV ad that highlights issues such as these. I have been digging up my own information concerning the members of the G7 simply because it looked very much like the set up that created our financial crisis following YK92. I challenge the media to do the same, show us who these purported leaders really are. Let us know the real Railas, Rutos, Uhurus, Wamalwas etc. Still, as beneficiaries of scam money, both Jirongo and Ruto should be thankful they can still speak in public, and not from prison cells. What YK92 did was criminal, and it is criminal that Ruto and his gang continue to discredit a national program that has benefited more real youth than their YK92 monster ever did.

  5. I imagine that since Ruto  discovered the wonders of facebook he doen’t have hiw lawns more, flowers weeded etc or probably they dont use slashers and jembes.

  6. This is good bwana Onyango, the Gang of 7 must be told explicitly who they are and what they have done to this country. It is insulting to hear someone who benefiting from the corruption network of YK92 and the old KANU order talk about youth empowerment. And I want to challenge Ruto to tell Kenyans which economy today thrive only on ‘computers’ – as he is bend on making us belief. Kenyans are very sharp and we know just like a jembe/ panga a computer is a tool used to make work happen. In all economies these tools are necessary as not all people have the same qualifications and opportunities. So I challenge the Gang of 7 to lay down their National agenda as opposed to personal read Raila agenda.

  7. thank you for the article. please kenyan, so the sake of our country dont vote these idiots G7,KKK or whatever they call themselve! Pangas and majembes are also tools of the trade! Cheap politics from cheap politicians.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hit enter to search or ESC to close