Lessons for Kenya from Ghanaian Elections


Ghana held its sixth consecutive elections since its democratic transition in 1992 on December 7, 2012 to elect a president and members of parliament in 275 electoral constituencies. This exercise provides vital lessons for Kenya as we prepare for the first general elections under the new constitution on March 4, 2013.

The Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA) deployed a 25-member Election Observer Mission to the 2012 Ghana Presidential and Parliamentary Elections. The mission was led by Mr Ahmed Issack Hassan, the chairman of Kenya’s Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

The members of the mission were drawn from Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and Electoral Management Bodies from 13 African countries. While still in Ghana, Mr Hassan also met former Ghanaian Presidents John Kufuor and Jerry Rawlings, and former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo with whom salient issues regarding the electoral process were discussed. Gen Obasanjo was the head of the AU and ECOWAS observer mission.

Ghana uses a Two-Round system for the presidential election and the First-Past-The-Post system for parliamentary election. Though there were challenges relating to the verification of voters before voting and late delivery of material in some areas, local and international observers concluded that the 2012 Ghana elections met regional, continental and international standards for credible and transparent elections.

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Ghana has become the fastest growing economy on the African continent, expanding by 14.4 percent in 2011, and with a projected growth of 8.2 percent for 2012. The country is also considered a stable and thriving democracy in Africa.

Just like Kenya, significant efforts were made by the Ghanaian electoral stakeholders to improve voter registration through adopting biometric technology in a bid to enhance the credibility and integrity of the voters’ register.

The 2012 elections were therefore a litmus test on the newly adopted biometric voter registration which produced new voter ID cards.

It was proven that biometric identification gives a lot of credibility to the electoral process. Apart from producing a valid identification document, a voter’s finger prints must be accepted by the machine to be allowed to cast a ballot. If the BVR system is successfully executed in Kenya, it will reduce the mistrust and irregularities that have been inherent in the system that we have been using.

In Ghana, voting materials are kept in police stations overnight. The police distribute them in the morning of the elections day without being accompanied by any election official. This may partly have been the reason for late delivery of materials and late opening of polling stations.

There were also reports of machines not working effectively and breakdowns leading to extension of voting to a second day. When all these happened, the patience exhibited by Ghanaians was enviable and quite commendable.

The special voting for Electoral Commission staff and security personnel, who work on voting day, was held three days before polling day. Personnel of the Ghana Armed Forces, the Ghana Police Service, the Ghana Immigration Service, the Customs Division of the Ghana Revenue Service, the Prisons Service and the Ghana National Fire Service also cast an early ballot. This is a good strategy to ensure no citizen is locked out of exercising their democratic right. The cast ballots were kept in police stations until after Election Day when they were to be counted.

On freedom of information and expression, observers noted that there are over 200 radio and TV stations in Ghana which are very independent of the State even though majority are owned by individuals; more so by politicians. Ghanaians have misgivings about them but they say they better be told lies by media houses than be misled or told untruths by politicians.

The media plays a constructive role in educating the citizens on the electoral process. Live debates among parties and candidates on various policy issues were hosted by the various media outlets. The media in Ghana also continued to carry out its duty to inform the electorate on the election results as they were made public by the Electoral Commission. The media reported on the results as reported by the elections officials.

The generally peaceful participation and enthusiasm witnessed among the electorate was very high as it had been predicted to be a close election between Mr Nana Akufo Addo’s – National Patriotic Party (NPP) and President John Dramani Mahama’s – National Democratic Congress (NDC). Mr Mahama was Ghana’s Vice-President until the unexpected death of President John Atta Mills in July catapulted him into office. “When you have a very close score, everybody is edgy and nobody wants to give any undue advantage to the other party,” said Nigerian Senator Musiliu Obanikoro, a member of the ECOWAS observer monitoring mission, in an interview with Al Jazeera.

There are 14 million registered voters in Ghana, spread across 26,000 polling centres. Some polling stations were on the pavements, roads and even homesteads but the voters were comfortable with this arrangement.

Voter turnout was an impressive 80 percent. That speaks volumes in terms of the citizen’s commitment to democracy and Kenyans should emulate this fine example. It is not all about government or the electoral management body but also about how responsive and responsible the people are, which greatly affects the conduct of elections.

The Elections Commission said Mr Dramani Mahama had secured 50.7pc of votes negating the need for a run-off against NPP candidate Nana Akufo-Addo with 47.7pc of the votes.

“The electoral commission officially announced the results for the presidential elections on the fifth day (two days before the seven days deadline) yet the people were calm,” said the IEBC Chairman Ahmed Issack Hassan adding that the maturity of the political leadership and the sense of national patriotism and pride by the people of Ghana indicated that they were keen to maintain the image of their country as a good example in Africa.

(Mutemi is the Manager, Communications and Corporate Affairs at the IEBC)

One Reply to “Lessons for Kenya from Ghanaian Elections”

  1. A very good report. We in Kenya need to learn lessons from these peaceful elections and the role all citizens of Ghana played in the whole election process. Kenyans need to come out of our tribal cocoons and try to work together as a people and country for the common good of all of us. Kenya belongs to all the over 41 tribes and State House is not the preserve of certain tribe or individual! Any Kenyan who qualifies to be among the top leaders of this country is free to carry out peaceful campaigns, asking Kenyans for support and election to the top office. This thing of rejecting others just because they do not come from our tribe, needs to stop. We need to cultivate an atmosphere of inclusiveness and the need for peaceful co-existence as Kenyans, ridding ourselves of the hatred we have against others who are not from our tribes. Kenyans need to stop taking each other for a ride. We need to be honest with one another. We need to accept each other as brothers and sisters of one nation called Kenya. Let us not destroy ourselves and our country, because of our hatred and selfishness. God help us to elect leaders who are capable of uniting the country and people of Kenya, and who have the people and country of Kenya at heart. God bless us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Hit enter to search or ESC to close