Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?
KRA Headquarters at Times Tower, Nairobi. FILE


Court of Appeal rules that KRA has legal power to search any premises and seize goods or documents

NAIROBI, Kenya, Apr 27 – The Court of Appeal has in a landmark ruling upheld that the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has legal power to search any premises and seize goods, documents or storage device as per the provisions of the Tax Procedures Act.

The powers to search any premises and seize goods, documents or storage device are donated to Kenya Revenue Authority by Section 44 and 60 of the Tax Procedures Act.

However, by a judgment delivered on 16th May 2018, the High Court sitting in Nairobi, in Dr. Robert Ayisi vs. Kenya Revenue Authority, held that the two Sections of the law serve to limit the rights of a person guaranteed by Article 31 (b) of the Constitution.

The Court went on to hold that the Section 44 and 60 of the Act did not pass the test set out under Article 24 of the Constitution which requires that any law limiting the rights guaranteed by the Constitution must be reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society.

Dissatisfied with the decision of the High Court, KRA launched an appeal to the Court of Appeal and sought to stay the judgment of the High Court.

In a landmark ruling, the Court of Appeal Judges Martha Koome, Fatuma Sichale and Jamila Mohamed found merit in the arguments advanced by KRA that it if curtailed from enforcing the provisions of Section 44 and 60 of the Tax Procedures Act, the orders issued by the High Court had far reaching implications and they would cripple Kenya Revenue Authority in execution of its mandate to enforce tax collection.

The Court of Appeal also appreciated that colossal sums of money in taxes were likely to be lost and in the event that the appeal succeeds, the loss will be irreversible.

The Court also held that this was a unique case that has a public interest, bearing in mind the mandate of the Kenya Revenue Authority as a tax collection agency on behalf of the people of Kenya.

Thus the Court held that it is imperative that the provisions of the law that were nullified by the High Court be subjected to a second opinion of the Court of Appeal before they are amended.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Court of Appeal has therefore stayed the entire judgment and orders of the High Court save for the order barring KRA from arresting former Nairobi County Secretary Dr. Robert Ayisi, which order remains in force.

Click to comment

More on Capital Business

Executive Lifestyle

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 12 – The country’s super wealthy individuals are increasing their holding of bonds, gold and cash, a new report by Knight...

Ask Kirubi

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 9 – Businessman and industrialist Dr. Chris Kirubi has urged members of the public to exercise extreme caution when making any...

Ask Kirubi

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 24 – Businessman and industrialist Dr. Chris Kirubi is set to own half of Centum Investment Company PLC, following a go-ahead...

Ask Kirubi

It is without a doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic has caught the whole world by surprise. Although its full impact is yet to be...


NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 18 – Commercial Banks have been ordered to provide relief to borrowers on their personal loans, with loans eligible from March...


NAIROBI, Kenya, Jun17 – Kenya’s tea leaves manufacturer Kericho Gold, has been awarded the Superbrands Seal by Superbrands East Africa for their quality variety...


NAIROBI, Kenya, Apr 13 – As the local telecommunications industry gears up to roll out 5G networks in the country, the Communications Authority of...


NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 22 – Airtel Kenya is offering free internet access for students in order to enable continued learning at home in the...