NEW YORK, June 27 – US authorities are set to announce Monday a deal in which the French bank BNP Paribas pleads guilty to helping some countries to avoid US sanctions and agrees to pay an $8.9 billion fine, the New York Times reported Friday.
Such a guilty plea by a major financial institution, in this case France’s biggest bank by market capitalization, is rare, the Times said.
At the request of US authorities, BNP has severed ties with a dozen employees, including two senior executives. But no one at the bank has been charged, the newspaper said, quoting people briefed on the case.
The deal with federal and New York state authorities had not been signed as of Thursday but barring a last minute obstacle US authorities hope to announce it at a press conference on Monday, the Times said.
The case concerns charges that BNP Paribas breached US sanctions against Iran, Sudan and Cuba between 2002 and 2009 by handling $30 billion worth of transactions with them.
The admission of guilt could have meant the bank would lose its license to operate in the United States.
Instead, the New York state financial regulator, Benjamin Lawsky, has taken aim at the bank’s ability to engage in dollar clearing — processing payments in dollar denominations. This key to dealing with international clients, the paper said.
Some units within the bank’s headquarters in Paris, and in its offices in Geneva and Singapore, will be barred from clearing dollar transactions for at least six months, the Times said.
The bank’s oil and gas unit is among those that face the suspension. It was involved in many of the illegal transactions in this case.
While most of the illicit transactions took place from 2002 to 2009, some stretched into 2012 while the US government had already launched its investigation, the Times said.
The French government has raised the matter several times at the highest level of US authorities, including with President B arack Obama.
France argued that a fine reported possibly to exceed $10 billion would be so disproprionate as to endanger negotiations between the European Union and United States over a free trade agreement.
They also argued that such a big fine would so weaken the bank as to cause a risk knock on effects through the banking system, although some analysts were sceptical about this.