Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Capital Business
Capital Business

World

Tata woes fuel debate on India drive

NEW DELHI, October 5 – A decision by the giant Tata Group to shift a factory building the world\’s cheapest car after angry farmer protests has refueled debate about India\’s troubled industrialisation push.

The company said late last week it was pulling the Nano car project out of West Bengal state, even though the plant near the state capital Kolkota was 90 percent completed.

The decision followed a month of violent demonstrations by evicted farmers and activists, and industry groups warned the move could blemish India\’s attractiveness as an investment destination.

Tata has said it will now construct the Nano — set to be priced at about 2,130 dollars — elsewhere in India.

The whole debacle underscores the need for companies "to be much much more careful about doing their homework" when they set up a plant, said Ajai Sahni, head of the New Delhi-based Institute for Conflict Management.

"They have to make sure the local population is amenable to the project and that compensation has been adequately provided," he said.

The protesters led by Mamata Banerjee, fiery chief of the regional Trinamool Congress party, had accused the Marxist state government of forcing farmers to give up their land for a pittance to make room for the high-profile factory.

The jelly-bean shaped vehicle was conceived by Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata as a way to make cars affordable to ordinary working-class Indians.

The West Bengal government offered up to 1.2 million rupees (25,000 dollars) an acre, depending on the fertility of the land, but that needed to be divided among four or more "stakeholders" in the plots.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Many critics said the money was not enough to allow the at least 12,000 people forced off their land to build new lives.

Industrialisation has been long championed by economists as a way to pull tens of millions of Indians out of poverty. But across the country, acquiring land for factories has frequently created battlegrounds.

There has been violence in Orissa state over South Korean steel giant POSCO’s plans for a 12-billion-dollar steel plant — India\’s largest foreign investment — and clashes over proposals for the creation of Special Economic Zones, a major thrust of the country\’s industrialisation drive.

A big part of the problem is the way land has been acquired, critics say.

Companies don\’t seek "to inflict harm on the local population, it\’s usually the incompetence of state governments using strong-arm measures," said Sahni.

Hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced for projects in India and the promised compensation is often inadequate or just never materialises, critics say.

"If you take away my livelihood and land and give me nothing in the way of alternative income, what do I have?" said Sahni.

When setting up plants, companies usually lease land from state governments that acquire the plots because of the complicated nature of land purchases in which securing title is notoriously difficult.

And sometimes, as in the case of Tata\’s Nano plant, the process can go badly awry.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

"The government behaved with enormous insensitivity, using (Marxist) cadres to engage in violence and intimidation" of farmers to accept the deal, Sahni said.

Some farmers complained their signatures handing over their land were forged by communist party workers.

The government\’s actions provided a rallying point for social activists and the Trinamool Congress, which hoped to use the issue to break the Marxists\’ 31-year rule over the state.

Abhirup Sarkar, an economist at the Indian Statistical Institute in Kolkata, also said many farmers were just not ready to give up their land for money.

"A lot of people aren\’t prepared for full-scale industrialisation, they don\’t know what to do with the money. They feel much safer with farming which they have been doing for generations," he said.

"They don\’t want to leave the safety net of agriculture."

At the end of the day, most observers believed that the plant was the victim of state politics, with Banerjee seeking to build her political base.

"It was an irresponsible political action," said T.K Bhaumik, an economist with Assocham, a leading business chamber.

"The farmers got nothing out of this. They have been left high and dry."

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Click to comment

Trending

Advertisement

More on Capital Business

Executive Lifestyle

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 12 – The country’s super wealthy individuals are increasing their holding of bonds, gold and cash, a new report by Knight...

Ask Kirubi

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 9 – Businessman and industrialist Dr. Chris Kirubi has urged members of the public to exercise extreme caution when making any...

Ask Kirubi

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 24 – Businessman and industrialist Dr. Chris Kirubi is set to own half of Centum Investment Company PLC, following a go-ahead...

Headlines

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 18 – Commercial Banks have been ordered to provide relief to borrowers on their personal loans, with loans eligible from March...

Ask Kirubi

It is without a doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic has caught the whole world by surprise. Although its full impact is yet to be...

Kenya

NAIROBI, Kenya, Jun17 – Kenya’s tea leaves manufacturer Kericho Gold, has been awarded the Superbrands Seal by Superbrands East Africa for their quality variety...

Coronavirus

NAIROBI, Kenya, Apr 13 – As the local telecommunications industry gears up to roll out 5G networks in the country, the Communications Authority of...

Coronavirus

NAIROBI, Kenya, Mar 22 – Airtel Kenya is offering free internet access for students in order to enable continued learning at home in the...