Related Story
Sorry no related story
|
Kenyan AG warns of constitutional crisis
BY BERNARD MOMANYI Updated : 199days and 15 hours and 30 minutes ago |
|
|
NAIROBI, Kenya, Feb 15 - Kenya’s Attorney General has said the country is on the verge of a Constitutional crisis following disagreements between President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga over the ‘suspension’ of two Cabinet ministers.
Mr Amos Wako said the law and the National Accord were very clear on what should be done in the event that a Cabinet Minister should be removed from office.
He however observed that while the Prime Minister announced that he had consulted his Coalition partner before making the controversial suspensions, the President had denied knowledge of the whole issue, making it difficult to know who was telling the truth.
“The Prime Minister has spoken, the President has also spoken. It is a weighty issue,” he said. It is an issue on which we can very easily move into a Constitutional crisis, it is just an issue of the facts.”
He said while the law clearly stated that suspensions and sackings can only be done after “total consultations,” it was difficult to tell who was stating the truth.
“What are the facts here in the sense that one says he consulted and another says he did not consult,” he said when questioned by reporters on the sidelines of the launch of a business process management system at the Office of the Public Trustee.
He added: “One (Prime Minister) has said he consulted which means he knows that that is the basis of the National Accord, the other one (President) says he was not consulted, really the issue here is all about facts,” he said and added he would issue a comprehensive statement on Monday afternoon or early Tuesday.
National Accord
“The basis of the national accord is total consultation and concurrence particularly between the two principals. Of course again in the Accord there is the issue where the President can also confer such other powers or functions as he may want to the Prime Minister, so to me really it is an issue of facts rather than what the law is.”
There have been mixed reactions since Sunday when the Prime Minister announced the ‘suspension’ of Agriculture Minister William Ruto and his Education counterpart Prof Sam Ongeri to facilitate investigations on the maize and Free Primary Education (FPE) scandals in which billion of shillings have been embezzled.
Mr Ruto and Prof Ongeri had insisted they would not vacate office and vowed to continue with their official ministerial duties before President Kibaki asked them to stay put.
On Monday, the two defiant Ministers reported to their offices as usual and vowed to continue discharging their duties.
The issue has once again stirred the country’s political climate, with some legislators allied to President Kibaki’s Party of National Unity (PNU) calling on the Prime Minister to resign.
The controversy began on Sunday after Mr Odinga announced that he was suspending Mr Ruto and Prof Ongeri after consultations with the President.
Hours later, the Presidential Press Service (PPS) dispatched a statement which said President Kibaki had quashed the Prime Minister’s decision “because there were no prior consultations.”
It read in part: “There has been no consultation between H.E. the President and the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister on the suspension of Hon. William Ruto, Minister for Agriculture and Hon. Prof. Sam Ongeri, Minister for Education, as announced by the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister today (Sunday) at a Press Conference.”
The President added: “The legal provisions, on which the Prime Minister acted, do not confer him the authority to cause a minister to vacate his or her office.”
In a quick rejoinder to the President’s stand, the Prime Minister told the British Broadcasting Corporation that the President “had overstepped his mandate.”
"I think that what I've done actually has been within my constitutional powers, and that the president does not have the powers to countermand what I have done," he told the BBC’s Network Africa programme.
|
|
|
|
| Comments (16) posted |
|
 |
| calistus (February 16th, 2010, 12:10 PM) |
|
 |
| Surely Kenyas, what are we discussing here? The issue at hand is CORRUPTION!! I like one comment which says someone has stolen our money. We know the person, so lets demand our money back and the thief/thieves taken to jain. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Monica Mumbi (February 15th, 2010, 9:27 PM) |
|
 |
| I am so ashamed to be a Kenyan. I am ashamed even to introduce myself as a Kenyan.
If Kibaki was really serious about fighting sleeze, he would have supported Raira's decision to suspend these two ministers.
From now on, corruption is one of the pillars of Kenyan economic activities. Kibaki has made it so. Anytime you hear kibaki yap about fighting corruption, please tell him to tell it to birds.
Kibaki thinks we are children? |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Jobiso (February 15th, 2010, 7:35 PM) |
|
 |
| Raila "merely" suspended the ministers; he did not dismiss or fire them. Raila's action clearly appears to be within the ambit of supervision. We cannot hold both principlas equally accountable for doing nothing about corruption when one of them doesn't even have the powers to do anything. Raila acted within the purview of supervision, and has done his part. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| biajo (February 15th, 2010, 7:04 PM) |
|
 |
| smiling AG should charm the 2 principals to a better understanding and working relationship.
the president should walk the talk and stamp corruption with decisive actions - not empty rhetoric words
kenya needs stability and this can only be achieved when we are honest and clear to deal with and sort out issues |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| omondi (February 15th, 2010, 7:01 PM) |
|
 |
| what if the presidnet is slepping?what does the accord say.it is about time he takes responsibility,if he can not call the shorts then somebody else should do the job. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Suma (February 15th, 2010, 6:52 PM) |
|
 |
| Some should answer Jeff's question! Does the constitution say consultation..in writing...and if so did Raila do so. My question is What is Raila wants to fight corruption while Kibaki is not interested. Does that mean Corruption wins! By not suspending them, Kibaki means...lets corruption continue! Simple. They failed to protect Wananchi and they did nothing after it happened. Kibaki did nothing either. I am in total support of Raila. Think about it. Someone millions of money in their pockets..your money..my money..We need to get it back or at least block the chance of them stealing again. FIGHT ON RAILA. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| George Njuguna (February 15th, 2010, 6:34 PM) |
|
 |
| Raila did the right thing constitutional or otherwise. What do u do if the boss will not take a decision? Kibaki has been left with mud on his face. Its a big shame on him. Heko Hon Raila and keep going. Honest Kenyans are behind you. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| beatrice (February 15th, 2010, 6:28 PM) |
|
 |
| president is the head of state and head of govermen,all other things are rubbish,to hell with all this nonsence |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Ericko (February 15th, 2010, 5:32 PM) |
|
 |
| Whether the PM consulted the president or not is not an issue. The issue is that the two ministers are corrupt. Ongeri himself confirmed in Kisii at a rally that he manupulated figures to favour his tribal region. Of what we know with a president who never makes decision, it's stupid of us to urgue wheter there was consultation or not. Lets fight corruption. The suspension stays. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Njuguna (February 15th, 2010, 5:26 PM) |
|
 |
| Rubbish The president under the coalition agreement is has no right to give orders like a King - the coalition was formed under equal footing for both parties
Kibaki has over lived his time in Statehouse he should step down
To Kenyans understanding -Kibaki can not run kenya like his kitchen, are Kenyans slaves too a few selfish beings? corruption, name it Anglo leasing -still pending, Grand regency still pending, Charter house bank, still bending, Triton oil saga still pending all this under kibaki's watch, it is time out. Kenyans are tired Kibaki taking back the country to the dark ages Kenyans will stand firm and demands all people involved in corruption must be sacked and there after face the Law.. Jail time is a must..
IDP's still suffering, Joblessness 65% in Kenya, Hunger everywhere -I'm from Nyeri and I can tell you all this time Kibaki went too far by supporting two corrupt ministers
|
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| steve N (February 15th, 2010, 5:14 PM) |
|
 |
| Ben Musau, Raila did not FIRE anyone, he SUSPENDED the ministers...that is the mandate the National Accord gives him. The point is, no one wants to admit or concede. Which means, corruption is what the government is rooting for. As much as we['re saying that Raila should act within the law...question is, there's ample proof that the ministers and other public officials have to permit adequate investigations to be carried out. No one wants to investigate the corrupt, no one wants the corrupt to be culpable, we all just want to sit and moan and graon about "kenyan solutions'. WHAT IS THE KENYAN SOLUTION? Did it solve Goldenberg, Anglo-leasing, IDP's issues, Mau Forest? FPE? Maize saga...? It's not about PNU or ODM, the whole lot is ROTTEN!! |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Jeff (February 15th, 2010, 5:07 PM) |
|
 |
| Does the Accord talk of the two Principals concurring in writing for a minister to be removed? |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Ken Ngeno (February 15th, 2010, 5:03 PM) |
|
 |
| For AG to predict constitutional crisis in our country is ridiculous yet he is the man who should be the first to state to all kenyans and the two principlas what the accord says.Mr Wako act now and save kenyans from demonstration &bloodshed coming out of your comfort zone and remind Kibaki and Raila what was signed on feb 2008.After all you have nothing to loose. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Siot Apollo Zaccaheaus (February 15th, 2010, 4:58 PM) |
|
 |
| In this case Kibaki is not commited to stop corruption and he still does not recognize the national accord he signed.I think Raila should and Kibaki should not pretend. the PM should just resign and constitutional crisis created thus back to the drawing board for fresh election.
Raila can as well operate well on the oppostion bench other sitting with someone who doesn't recognize him as a Principle. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| stanman (February 15th, 2010, 4:57 PM) |
|
 |
| It appears to me it is case of who has bigger balls. Also and more pertinent it could be a case of loss of authority on the part of the president and further fears that most of his PNU MPs (and other allies) would be vulnerable to the ruthlessness Raila is unleashing on these errant Ministers and others. |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
| Ben Musau (February 15th, 2010, 4:44 PM) |
|
 |
| The consitution is clear, the presidet shall appoint and fire ministers, the national accord talks of consultations between the two, so Raila should have consulted the president and the president is the only one who should have announced the firing since he is the hiring authority and this is clearly stated in the constitution, Riala was not advised accordingly by his persons and thus he should also be fired, i urge him to tell his advisers to read the constitution and the accord well inorder to accordingly understand it, as things stand now, Raila should appologise and go back to to the table to negotiate, running to the international media BBC does not help at all, lets look for Kenyan made solution but not international bickering |
|
 |
 |
|
| |
Post your comment  |
| |
|
|
|