UN Security Council demands protection of hospitals in war zones

May 3, 2016 6:22 pm
Shares
The Al-Quds hospital in Aleppo was destroyed by Syrian regime airstrikes on April 28, 2016/AFP
The Al-Quds hospital in Aleppo was destroyed by Syrian regime airstrikes on April 28, 2016/AFP

, United Nations, United States – The UN Security Council on Tuesday demanded that hospitals and clinics be protected in war zones, in a resolution that draws attention to the rise in attacks on medical workers in conflicts worldwide.

Less than a week after air strikes on a hospital in the Syrian battleground city of Aleppo killed at least 30 people, the council unanimously adopted a measure that strongly condemned the targeting of health facilities and recalled that such attacks are war crimes.

Overview
  • The resolution "demands that all parties to armed conflicts fully comply with their obligations under international law... to ensure the respect and protection of all medical personnel and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transport and equipment, as well as hospitals and other medical facilities."
  • The vote came days after the United States said its troops involved in the bombing of a MSF-run hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz would not face war crimes charges.

French Ambassador Francois Delattre described the measure as a “major resolution” that sent a strong message that there will be “no impunity for the authors of attacks perpetrated against medical installations and medical personnel.”

The resolution does not break any new legal ground. But British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft stressed that it was “shining a spotlight” on the increase in attacks and serves as a reminder that hospitals, ambulances and medical workers cannot be targets in war.

It was the first-ever resolution adopted by the council specifically on the need to protect medical facilities in war zones.

According to Doctors Without Borders (MSF), there were 94 attacks in Syria against hospitals and clinics supported by that NGO and three MSF-managed or supported health facilities in Yemen have been bombed over the past six months.

Hospitals and clinics in South Sudan have been pillaged repeatedly over the past three years.

– ‘Something is deeply wrong’ –

The resolution “demands that all parties to armed conflicts fully comply with their obligations under international law… to ensure the respect and protection of all medical personnel and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transport and equipment, as well as hospitals and other medical facilities.”

“Such attacks must end,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the council.

“When so-called surgical strikes end up hitting surgical wards, something is deeply wrong.”

The resolution was drafted by five non-permanent Security Council members: Egypt, Japan, Spain, New Zealand and Uruguay.

It was presented at a time when four of the five permanent council members — Britain, France, Russia and the United States — are backing parties in the Syria conflict.

Syria’s state media reported that rebel fire on a hospital in the government-controlled area of Aleppo had killed three women and wounded another 17 on Tuesday.

The vote came days after the United States said its troops involved in the bombing of a MSF-run hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz would not face war crimes charges.

The attack last October left 42 people dead and sparked global outrage, forcing President Barack Obama to make a rare apology.

A US investigation found the 16 troops involved made a series of mistakes under the stress of battle and had targeted the facility by mistake, but that they would be reprimanded instead of court-martialled.

The resolution requests that Ban present recommendations on measures to prevent attacks and to ensure that those who carry them out are held accountable.

Shares

Latest Articles

Most Viewed