Tribunal wants Nancy Baraza sacked

Baraza has 10 days within which she can challenge the decision of the tribunal/FILE

NAIROBI, Kenya, Aug 6 – The tribunal investigating the conduct of the Deputy Chief Justice Nancy Baraza has recommended her removal from the Judiciary for gross misconduct.

The seven-member tribunal chaired by former Chief Justice of Tanzania Augustino Ramadhani has now advised President Mwai Kibaki to remove Baraza – who is also the Vice President of the Supreme Court – from office.

Baraza was accused of assaulting security guard Rebecca Kerubo and threatening to shoot her on New Year’s Eve at the Village Market shopping mall.

“We are satisfied that the allegations have been proved and that we have no doubt in our minds that what was alleged to have occurred did in fact occur,” Ramadhani said.

“We therefore find that allegation number one has been sufficiently proved that the DCJ pinched the nose of Kerubo and that the conduct displayed by DCJ was demeaning her office to say the least.”

“Allegation number two has also been sufficiently proved that the DCJ threatened to shoot Kerubo with a pistol and that conduct constitutes gross misconduct on her part.”

The tribunal pointed out that despite a brilliant career in which she made an outstanding contribution to the nation as an advocate and commissioner of the Constitution Review Commission, there were aggravating factors which show she lacked the temperament and ability to perform judicial functions.

“She didn’t carry herself in the manner anticipated by the Constitution and the Judicial Code of Conduct,” they ruled. “Every single judge has a potential of preserving or tarnishing the integrity of the Judiciary on every occasion.”

Baraza was accused of contacting Kerubo and her fellow guard Anthony Makhanu on June 27, a week before the tribunal was scheduled to start its hearing where she asked them to alter their evidence that she brandished a pistol and threatened to shoot Kerubo.

But Baraza told the tribunal that she had merely wanted to reconcile with Kerubo.

“This was a very serious undertaking conducted by a judicial officer. We are therefore not convinced the Deputy Chief Justice cannot be expected not to engage in this kind of misconduct or misbehaviour in the future,” they said.

“The fact that she improperly contacted witnesses also raises concerns about her ability to refrain from future misconduct.”

In their opinion, the tribunal ruled, a judge who engages in lawless conduct and thereafter tries to explain it away with misleading testimony ‘should not continue in office.’

“The tribunal members have unanimously found that the conduct of the DCJ on 31st December 2011 at the Village Market amounted to both gross misconduct and misbehaviour,” they said.

“We therefore recommend to Your Excellency Mwai Kibaki that Lady Justice Nancy Makokha Baraza, the Deputy Chief Justice and the Vice President of the Supreme Court of Kenya, be removed from Office.”

According to the Constitution in Article 168 (8) Baraza has 10 days within which she can challenge the decision of the tribunal.

“A judge who is aggrieved by a decision of the tribunal under this Article may appeal against the decision to the Supreme Court, within 10 days after the tribunal makes its recommendations.”

In the absence of an appeal, the president is obligated to act on the recommendations of the tribunal and remove Baraza from office.

JUDIE KABERIA

JUDIE KABERIA

Judie is a Special Projects Reporter. She has eight years experience in Journalism in Kenya and Germany. She has scooped awards in Reproductive Health, Population and Development and Gender and Development. She has participated in international conferences in Germany. She has a soft spot for human rights and justice stories.

  • http://www.facebook.com/japheth.okoth Jeff Japheth

    the judgement should be used as a case law……..i just urge the same to be done to our top presidential contenders!……….chapter six!,

  • Francis

    How sad that to this day the DCJ cannot see the damage she has caused the judiciary.That her actions after the incidence were so juvenile and arrogant that even if she was innocent of the charges- no sane person in her position would engage in the kienyeji stuff she resulted to.Seeking to smear through paid morons in name of “experts” and tribal politicians a poor Kenyan whose only “sin” was to do her work as required by her employer.Such a person cannot be the gate-keeper of justice.For the JSC this presents a chance to right the wrongs in the composition of the highest court.The court MUST now appoint a minority- A WOMAN AND A PERSON OF ASIAN DESCENT for the court to reflect the “FACE OF KENYA”.The contribution to our justice system by this group of Kenyans at our neediest hour has been so great and their contribution to our economy/culture and growth is the single most by one group.Why the supreme court would have no person of Asian origin is a scandal by itself.I hope JSC is listening and will see beyond myopic considerations and own up.Where better to show justice but in the court itself!

  • James

    Truly this is a new constitutional dispensation at work!

  • Ebs

    It is only the blood of Jesus that cleanses white as snow…

  • http://www.facebook.com/beloveddan Beloved King

    With this ruling, neither as per chapter six, neither Uhuru or Ruto are fit for election.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kwessi-Pratt/100000996986819 Kwessi Pratt

    Another fake reformer with marauding anger has been shown the door! The whole chain is made of irresponsible fakes whose only claim to reform song is just an opportuinstic attack on government. No conviction and no love for the country. Some sort of traitors playing saviors! What an irony? Miguna Miguna’s book is surely a masterstroke.

  • sue

    this is not trivial as my fellow kenyans may want to term it, if she can pinch a nose and threaten to kill, what ealse has she done or will be she capable of doing? how fair is she in the court system. if she is mean to the little people, would the little people have a fair hearing in the court of law?